Two Starbucks employees in St. Louis did exactly what any decent person would do when armed robbers stormed their store, assaulted staff and customers, and demanded cash. They fought back — and Starbucks fired them for it.
The incident happened on a Sunday afternoon in December 2023 at the Starbucks located at 212 South Grand Boulevard in Midtown St. Louis. Twenty-year-old Michael Harris was working the drive-thru when two men entered the store. One went behind the counter, shoved a female coworker to the ground, and struck Harris over the head with what appeared to be a gun. The robbers began frisking customers and demanding money from the register.
That’s when Harris and his coworker, Devin Jones-Ransom, decided they weren’t going to just stand there and let it happen. They fought back. The “gun” turned out to be fake — it cracked when used as a weapon. One robber fled, but Harris and Jones-Ransom managed to restrain the other until police arrived.
Both robbers were later convicted and sent to jail.
Video:
Weeks later, Starbucks called Harris and Jones-Ransom and terminated them. The company claimed they violated policy by confronting the robbers instead of complying with the “give them what they want and stay safe” training that most big chains push on employees.
Let that sink in. These two young workers were assaulted inside their own workplace. They protected their coworkers and customers. They helped get violent criminals off the street. And Starbucks’ response was to fire them.
Michael Harris was studying to become a paramedic at the time. He later filed a wrongful termination lawsuit against the company, arguing he was punished for doing the right thing when he and his coworker were being physically attacked. Reports indicate the case has gone through arbitration and appeals, with Starbucks’ attempts to force the matter into private arbitration facing setbacks.
This isn’t an isolated corporate brain fart. Big companies like Starbucks have long policies that tell employees to stand down during robberies to minimize liability and insurance headaches. In theory, it’s about safety. In practice, when the robbers start pistol-whipping people and the “gun” turns out to be a prop, that policy starts looking like cowardice dressed up as corporate risk management.
The employees didn’t go looking for a fight. They were assaulted first. They defended themselves and others. Instead of being hailed as heroes who stopped a crime in progress, they got pink slips.
Customers and the public have every right to be outraged. These workers showed courage in a moment when many people would have frozen or run. Starbucks chose to punish them rather than stand behind them. That kind of “reward” tells every other employee in the company: Keep your head down, even if someone is hurting your coworkers. The company’s image and legal exposure matter more than you.
Harris and Jones-Ransom didn’t just survive an armed robbery attempt — they stopped it and helped put the bad guys behind bars. Starbucks repaid that bravery by showing them the door.
This story is a perfect example of why so many people have lost faith in big corporations that preach one thing about “values” and “community” while treating their own people like disposable liabilities when it actually counts.
The robbers got justice in court. The real question is whether Starbucks will ever do the right thing by the employees who protected their store when it mattered most.
—
