Teamsters President Sean O’Brien has revealed a startling interaction with Vice President Kamala Harris, describing her as dismissive and unprepared during a recent meeting with union leadership. According to O’Brien, Harris only addressed three out of 16 questions posed to her before abruptly ending the meeting with a defiant statement and a finger wave.
The incident unfolded when O’Brien and other Teamsters presented Harris with a series of pressing questions related to labor issues. O’Brien recounted, “There’s 16 questions here. So she answers three of them, and on the fourth question, one of her operatives or one of her staff slips a note in front of me.”
The note reportedly signaled the meeting’s premature conclusion, cutting off 20 minutes earlier than scheduled. But it was Harris’s parting words that truly ruffled feathers: “On the way out she says, ‘I’m gonna win with you or without you.’”
The moment left union leaders stunned. O’Brien emphasized Harris’s dismissive attitude, highlighting how she not only dodged critical questions but also left the impression that the concerns of organized labor were secondary to her political ambitions.
For a vice president already facing criticism for her handling of major issues, including the border crisis and her lackluster approval ratings, this latest incident has fueled more skepticism about her ability to connect with key voter blocs.
WATCH: The video of Sean O’Brien recounting the incident has sparked outrage, with critics slamming Harris for her arrogance and lack of substance.
NEW: Teamsters president says Kamala Harris could only answer 3 of their 16 questions before arrogantly saying she was going to win “with or without you.”
Worst candidate in history.
Sean O'Brien says Harris waved her finger in their faces before the incident.
“There’s 16… pic.twitter.com/tDKu8EQnOo
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) December 24, 2024
The interaction raises serious questions about Harris’s approach to leadership and her ability to engage meaningfully with groups like the Teamsters, who have historically been influential in Democratic campaigns.
Opinion Disclaimer: This article reflects the author’s interpretation of the events and should not be taken as an endorsement of any political party or candidate.
