Washington, D.C. – On April 28, 2025, the White House lawn became a powerful stage for President Trump’s immigration crackdown, with a display of posters showcasing mugshots of arrested illegal immigrants and their alleged crimes—first-degree murder, child sexual abuse, kidnapping, rape, and drug distribution—strategically placed along the driveway for maximum media exposure. The setup, reported by Fox News on April 28 [], has conservatives on X, like @MAGAForce2024, ecstatic: “Yard signs don’t win elections? White House lawn just proved otherwise—GLORIOUS!”

The placards, stamped with the White House logo and the word “ARRESTED” in bold red, were positioned near Pebble Beach, where TV crews often film live shots, ensuring visibility during broadcasts, per Axios on April 28 []. Each poster listed the immigrants’ alleged crimes, tying into Trump’s 100th-day milestone and his administration’s focus on immigration enforcement, with 88,763 deportations since January 2025, per DHS []. Kaelan Dorr, a Trump spokesperson, shared a photo of the display on X, writing, “White House lawn looks a little different this AM… And they say yard signs don’t win elections…,” a quip that conservatives like @PatriotPulse celebrated: “Dorr’s right—Trump’s making a statement that hits hard!”

Photos:

Video:

The display, also covered by the New York Post on April 28 [], aligns with Trump’s recent invocation of the Alien Enemies Act to expedite deportations, a policy Kollar-Kotelly’s ruling didn’t address, per Twitchy []. It’s a visual extension of Trump’s promise to tackle crime linked to illegal immigration, spotlighted by a recent ICE raid yielding 475 arrests, per the White House []. Conservatives see it as a political masterstroke. @America1stMAGA wrote, “Trump’s lawn display is a middle finger to the open-border crowd—shows exactly who we’re deporting!” @JusticeForAll22 added, “This is why Trump won—real action, not just words!”

The White House lawn setup, with its stark imagery and strategic placement, has conservatives buzzing with pride, viewing it as a bold move that not only highlights Trump’s immigration wins but also flips the script on the old adage about yard signs. As the posters dominate media coverage, Trump supporters are reveling in what they see as a visual victory in the fight for a secure America.

Atlanta, GA – CNN’s senior data analyst Harry Enten delivered a brutal reality check to liberal pundits and anti-Trump Republicans on April 16, 2025, debunking the narrative of widespread Trump voter regret in a video that’s making waves among conservatives on X. The segment, shared by @CNNPolitics, dismantles the myth propagated by what conservatives call “shoddy polling from anti-Trump clown operations,” revealing that only 2% of Trump’s 2024 voters would change their vote—a statistic that has Trump supporters like @MAGAForce2024 crowing, “Libs tried to spin regret, but CNN just shut them down!”

Enten, speaking on CNN Newsroom, stated, “I hear all these stories, all these articles, ‘All the Trump voters, they regret what they did back in 2024.’ I’m here to tell you, ‘Uh uh.’ Very few of them regret what they did back in 2024.” A brand-new poll from April 2025, conducted by YouGov with a sample of 1,500 2024 voters, backs him up: just 2% of Trump voters said they’d vote differently, while 1% wouldn’t have voted at all—numbers identical to Kamala Harris’ supporters. “If there’s some idea out there that Trump voters are going around, ‘Man, I wish I had voted for Kamala Harris instead of Donald Trump,’ the numbers say that is a fanciful universe,” Enten added, noting that in 2017, 4% of Trump voters expressed regret—meaning his base is more steadfast now.

Video below:

Conservatives on X, like @PatriotPulse, celebrated the data: “Trump’s base is rock solid—2% regret is nothing! Libs can’t handle the truth.” @America1stMAGA echoed, “CNN tried to push a narrative and failed—Trump voters aren’t budging!” The findings align with a PJ Media report on April 16 [], which noted Trump’s enduring popularity despite media claims of buyer’s remorse. Enten’s analysis also serves as a warning for Republicans: Trump drives turnout, but the party must plan for a post-Trump future, as the Obama coalition’s transferability proved illusory for Democrats, per a 2025 Rolling Stone piece [].

For Trump supporters, Enten’s takedown is a victory lap, proving their loyalty isn’t shaken by liberal spin or economic concerns—like the 52% who think the economy is on the wrong track, per a HarrisX/Harvard poll on April 9 []. “The 2024 election would’ve been the same—Trump wins again,” wrote @JusticeForAll22. The video has conservatives gloating, seeing it as proof that the anti-Trump media’s efforts to undermine his mandate have fallen flat.

On April 10, 2025, Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed Senate Bill 25-003 into law, a move that sent shockwaves through the gun-owning community and sounded an alarm for Second Amendment defenders nationwide. This legislation, which bans the manufacture and severely restricts the sale of semi-automatic firearms with detachable magazines, isn’t just another gun control measure—it’s a direct assault on the constitutional protections affirmed by the Supreme Court. If you own a firearm or care about your right to self-defense, Colorado’s new law is a wake-up call you can’t ignore.

BREAKING: Colorado Gov. Jared Polis signs SB25-003 into law, banning the manufacture of and severely restricting the sale of certain semiautomatic firearms with detachable magazines. #coleg #copolitics @DenverChannel pic.twitter.com/kmN56Nt80a

— Brandon Richard (@BrandonLRichard) April 10, 2025

Let’s break it down: SB25-003 doesn’t just target rifles like the AR-15, which gun control advocates love to demonize. It casts a net so wide it ensnares most modern handguns—semi-automatic pistols with detachable magazines that millions of Americans rely on for personal protection. This isn’t a narrow restriction; it’s a de facto ban on the most commonly used firearms in the country. The Supreme Court’s landmark 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller couldn’t be clearer: the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms “in common use” for lawful purposes, especially self-defense. Semi-automatic rifles and handguns fit that bill—they’re the backbone of modern self-defense. Colorado’s law doesn’t just skirt Heller’s precedent; it spits in its face.

The audacity of this legislation is staggering. Polis, who once flirted with libertarian cred, signed a bill that he must know is constitutionally radioactive. To buy one of the restricted firearms, Coloradans now face a gauntlet: a sheriff’s approval, up to 12 hours of training, and a background check. These aren’t safety measures—they’re barriers designed to choke off access. For low-income folks or those in rural areas, the time and cost (estimated at up to $200) could make legal gun ownership a pipe dream. It’s a policy that screams elitism, leaving self-defense to the wealthy and well-connected while criminals, who don’t bother with permits, roam free.

Why does this matter beyond Colorado’s borders? Because it’s a blueprint. If this law stands, it’s a green light for every blue state to gut the Second Amendment. Imagine California, New York, or Illinois copying this playbook—suddenly, half the country becomes a no-go zone for modern firearms. Without national reciprocity, law-abiding gun owners could face a patchwork of bans that make travel or relocation a legal minefield. And don’t kid yourself: the endgame for gun control activists isn’t “common-sense reform.” It’s total disarmament. Colorado’s law is the boldest step yet toward that goal, and if it’s not stopped, it won’t be the last.

The stakes are sky-high, and the clock is ticking. Gun rights groups like the NRA and Rocky Mountain Gun Owners are already gearing up for legal challenges, and they need to move fast. Heller and the 2022 Bruen decision, which reinforced that gun laws must align with historical traditions, give courts a clear roadmap to strike this down. But if lower courts fumble or delay, this could drag on, emboldening other states to follow suit. A Supreme Court showdown is inevitable—and it better come soon, because the longer this law lingers, the more it normalizes the idea that states can ignore the Constitution.

Colorado’s transformation is a gut punch. Once a purple state where gun culture thrived, it’s now a laboratory for progressive experiments, fueled by transplants and a leftward lurch. Polis’ signature on SB25-003 exposes his “libertarian” label as a sham—he’s just another politician torching rights for clout. This isn’t about safety; it’s about control. The data backs this up: states with strict gun laws don’t see lower crime rates, and mass shootings often happen in “gun-free” zones. Criminals don’t follow laws, but Colorado’s betting you’ll be disarmed anyway.

Every gun owner needs to pay attention because this fight is yours. If Colorado’s law isn’t slapped down hard, it’s open season on the Second Amendment. Call it a warning shot—time to lock and load for the battle ahead.